Home » The DeFi market desperately needs to connect with real-world assets
Business News

The DeFi market desperately needs to connect with real-world assets

The DeFi market desperately needs to connect with real-world assets

With over $13 billion in whole worth locked, decentralized finance has actually shaken the crypto world within the final 12 months. It has offered a brand new method to revenue from the crypto market. In the meantime, DeFi proper now’s solely a distinct segment pattern with a big potential to start out a revolution within the enterprise mortgage market. To be able to develop out of diapers, DeFi desperately must be related with real-world belongings and exist in an setting the place it may be utilized by actual companies, company purchasers, and many others.

As an idea, DeFi actually appears to be like like a win-win resolution for individuals who already maintain crypto, as they lastly get to have some passive revenue from incentivization mechanisms and yield farming, and for debtors, as they will profit from a mortgage with phrases that no conventional venue can supply.

Volatility and over-collateralization

Nonetheless, there are a number of issues with DeFi that should be addressed urgently. The primary main downside for all events concerned is over-collateralization to account for value volatility.

Normally, protocols require debtors to collateralize their loans at a minimal of 150% of the worth of the mortgage. So, let’s say you wish to borrow $100. Which means you would need to collateralize your mortgage with a minimal of $150. Due to this fact, in case your collateral drops under the $150 level in worth, your mortgage would then be topic to a liquidation penalty.

Over-collateralization is a big hurdle to reaching one of many principal objectives of DeFi: making monetary providers actually accessible. And the identical downside happens with stablecoins issued by DeFi protocols, as they require over-collateralization too.

Volatility of the collateral has prompted losses totaling 6.65 million Dai (about $6.65 million) for Maker already and may trigger extra comparable circumstances sooner or later.

No connection to real-world belongings

This concern could also be debatable, as an entire lot of individuals within the crypto house wish to keep remoted in their very own playground. Nonetheless, crypto is changing into part of a world monetary system, and with a view to keep there, crypto have to be related to the skin world, and there shall be completely no progress with out it.

However placing my private views and beliefs apart, the shortage of connection to real-world belongings damages the DeFi house in various methods. First, it doesn’t permit conventional corporations to borrow funds, as they will’t present something however crypto as collateral. The second concern is the shortage of actual money flows behind protocol tokens, that means an absence of stability within the value of protocol tokens, that are the principle instrument of incentivization. In the long term, all the above points restrict the additional progress of DeFi as a paradigm and, most significantly, result in the danger of protocols’ default because of lack of worth of their tokens.

The answer for DeFi

With all points in thoughts, the DeFi house requires an infrastructure that may bridge the hole between real-world belongings and the DeFi ecosystem, permitting anybody to make use of real-world belongings as collateral to borrow cash from protocols.

So, will any real-world asset work? Not precisely. The asset should meet easy standards that may permit for fixing the above points:

  • The asset have to be steady with a view to clear up volatility and over-collateralization points.
  • The asset should generate periodical mounted revenue with a view to deliver real-world money flows.
  • The worth of a collateral asset have to be decided in a clear means primarily based on a number of confirmed and acknowledged sources.

The asset that meets these standards and solves the aforementioned points comes within the type of bonds or fixed-income securities.

Why bonds shall be a win-win for conventional and DeFi markets

With over $5 billion locked in DeFi lending alone and over $13 billion locked total, it is going to be an ideal means for corporates to borrow cash with no book-building and advertising efforts in any respect.

Together with that, shifting conventional monetary merchandise to the open-source and decentralized world drastically reduces the variety of intermediaries required to draw financing, minimizing its value. Whereas within the present system, bond issuance prices could embody charges paid to exchanges, fee brokers, trustees, banks, legal professionals and ranking businesses.

In case you look from the buyers’ perspective, they are going to obtain protocols with a degree of stability that has by no means been seen available on the market earlier than. Using bonds prevents the protocol from over-collateralization and ensures the steadiness of the asset, even in instances of excessive volatility within the crypto market, subsequently eliminating the danger of liquidation.

Most significantly, the usage of real-world debt obligations will permit protocols to earn mounted periodical revenue, which might be distributed amongst buyers. Principally, it’ll permit DeFi buyers to learn each from revenue generated by the collateral and curiosity funds made by debtors.

Hurdles to constructing such a system

Usually talking, DeFi is remoted from conventional finance. The primary, most blatant downside is that DeFi borrowing requires collateral within the type of digital belongings. At the moment, there isn’t any ready-to-go infrastructure to make use of real-world belongings as collateral in DeFi protocols.

The following downside is closely tied in with the entire construction of the DeFi market now: Debtors are capable of entice funds from DeFi protocols strictly in crypto, and the identical happens to curiosity funds. As corporates function within the conventional system, borrowing funds and debt compensation have to be set in fiat.

And the final downside is the absence of a conventional authorized framework when borrowing from a protocol. There are not any formal agreements in place, which raises difficulties for the accounting remedy of borrowed funds.


I consider that the DeFi market desperately must construct a regulated bridge with the normal monetary market with a view to guarantee steady progress. Concurrently, company establishments — each holders and issuers of debt securities — shall be keen to take the perfect of DeFi infrastructure and profit from a mortgage with phrases that no conventional venue can supply.

Reference to fiat money flows blended with mounted periodic revenue will permit buyers in DeFi to learn each from revenue generated by the collateral that lies contained in the protocol and curiosity funds paid by debtors. On the similar time, steady real-world collateral similar to bonds reduces the danger of liquidation to a minimal, guaranteeing the steadiness of the protocol.

To be able to obtain that, the DeFi market requires advanced infrastructural options that may guarantee compliance with present regulation for company establishments, permitting them to entry funds and repay loans in fiat. On the similar time, such infrastructure will should be operated with the curiosity of the DeFi group in thoughts, subsequently guaranteeing appropriate interplay between bonds and protocols.

The views, ideas and opinions expressed listed here are the writer’s alone and don’t essentially mirror or signify the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Artem Tolkachev is the founder and CEO of Tokenomica. For over six years, Artem has been a key blockchain and tokenization opinion chief within the CIS area. Since 2011, he has been an mental property and knowledge expertise lawyer and entrepreneur. In 2016, Artem based and headed Deloitte CIS Blockchain Lab. As a part of that initiative, he led a variety of modern tasks involving the implementation of enterprise blockchain options, tokenization of real-world belongings, tax and authorized structuring of safety token choices, improvement of cryptocurrency, and blockchain laws.